According to Mick Jagger, it’s lonely at the top. Intel might agree.
After all, for the past five years, the company has put an increasingly
large gap between its fastest desktop processors and AMD’s own best
efforts. Enthusiasts tend to lament the fact that a lack of intense
competition means they pay more for high-end hardware. But, if you’ve
been around long enough, you know that Intel’s Extreme Edition CPUs were
always thousand-dollar affairs and, once upon a time, AMD’s vaunted
FX-series chips used to be worth their $700+ asking prices.
The fact that the $1000 price point persists today, eight years
later, means Intel recognizes the extremely limited market for these
flagship desktop processors and isn’t about to push one of its crown
jewels even further out of reach.
|
Intel Sandy Bridge-E |
It comes as little surprise, then, to see yet another Extreme Edition
processor hovering around $1000. But this behemoth is very different
than what came before.
The prior generation of flagship parts based on Gulftown came armed
with six physical cores and up to 12 MB of shared L3 cache. They boasted
LGA 1366 compatibility, extending the useful lives of pricey X58
Express motherboards, helping soften the blow of $500+ processor
upgrades. No such luck this time; you’re facing a pricier investment.
Sandy Bridge-E, Gulftown’s successor, employs an LGA 2011 interface,
requiring new motherboards based on Intel’s X79 Express Platform
Controller Hub. It also comes armed with an integrated quad-channel
memory controller, necessitating four-module memory kits. Oh, and then
there’s the fact that Intel isn’t planning to bundle its new chips with
coolers, requiring a separate purchase there, too.
Meet Sandy Bridge-E
Intel is announcing three Sandy Bridge-E-based models today, but only
two will be available through the end of 2011: Core i7-3960X and Core
i7-3930K. The third, Core i7-3820, is slated for a Q1 2012 introduction.
|
Gulftown is big; Sandy Bridge-E is much bigger |
|
2011 pins require a lot of space |
All three employ the same die, which is composed of 2.27 billion transistors and measures 434 square millimeters
(making it a very big chip). In comparison, quad-core Sandy Bridge
parts are made up of 995 million transistors and measure 216 square
millimeters, while six-core Gulftown CPUs incorporate more than 1.1
billion transistors in a 248 square millimeter die.
Of course, Sandy Bridge-E was never intended to be a desktop
processor exclusively. Rather, it’s going to emerge in the first part of
next year as Xeon E5 for single- and dual-socket servers/workstations.
In
that context, the CPU’s size and complexity makes more
sense. After all, Westmere-EX (at the heart of Intel’s more
enterprise-oriented Xeon E7 family) is a 2.6 billion-transistor die
occupying 513 square millimeters of space.
|
Core i7-3960X, with two cores and 5 MB L3 cache disabled |
When Sandy Bridge-E surfaces as Xeon, it’ll offer up to eight
processing cores and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. As a desktop CPU,
however, it’s limited to as many as six cores and up to 15 MB of shared
L3. Intel achieves this by disabling two cores and four of the die’s 16
slices of shared L3 cache.
Of course, that configuration only applies to Core i7-3960X. Core
i7-3930K, which also features six cores, dips down to 12 MB of cache,
revealing Intel’s ability to very granularly disable pieces of the
shared L3 to suit its needs. The upcoming Core i7-3820 will employ four
cores and 10 MB of shared L3 cache—essentially half of a Sandy Bridge-E
die. Each core includes 32 KB of L1 instruction and L1 data cache, plus a
dedicated 256 KB L2 cache.
|
Sandy Bridge-E Family |
The clocks on all three SKUs range up and down as well. The -3960X
starts at 3.3 GHz and, through the same second-gen Turbo Boost
technology introduced with Sandy Bridge, speeds up to 3.9 GHz. The
-3930K starts at 3.2 GHz and hits a peak of 3.8 GHz in lightly-threaded
workloads. Finally, the -3820 will start at 3.6 GHz and reach
frequencies of up to 3.9 GHz with Turbo Boost.
Of course, the X- and K-series chips are also multiplier-unlocked,
making those stock clocks pretty much meaningless for most enthusiasts
planning to tweak their systems. Intel calls the -3820 “partially
unlocked.” In all actuality, it gets six 100 MHz bins above its maximum
Turbo Boost setting of 3.9 GHz, translating to a ceiling of 45x.
|
iTunes 10.4.1.10 |
|
Lame Per Clock |
Intel is using the same cores found in its Sandy Bridge-based CPUs.
Turning off Turbo Boost, setting similar base clocks, and running a
couple of single-threaded apps demonstrates the efficient execution
Sandy Bridge brings to the table compared to Thuban or Zambezi.
|
itunes turbo boost |
|
7-zip turbo boost |
Switching Turbo Boost back on and running Core i7-3960X in
parallelized and single-threaded titles gives us a better impression of
what
that technology does for performance.
In an application like iTunes, which is only able to utilize one
core, Turbo Boost improves performance by 12.8%. In 7-Zip
(well-optimized to use available cores), it increases performance by
10.8%. The second number is surprisingly high because Turbo pushes an
additional three 100 MHz bins when five or six cores are active and none
of the technology’s triggers are tripped. As a result, it's tackling
our compression workload at 3.6 GHz instead of 3.3.
No comments:
Post a Comment